[Hey, now. Her lifespan is probably like 10,000 years? Unless she gets her wish in which case it no longer will be.]
No, I didn't think so. I wouldn't consider it worthwhile to approach you without a realistic plan that is at least as advantageous to you as letting us be eaten would be.
I only wanted to be certain I understood your motives correctly.
More advantageous? Why? In the sense that it's riskier, so it ought to have a better payoff?
What I'm suggesting is that if there were two alternatives, both with the same risks and rewards, but one had us dead and the other had us alive, perhaps you could be persuaded to the plan where we live. Obviously 'same risk and rewards' is hypothetical and dubious, but humour me for a moment.
It would take considerable effort for that. As it stands, there are few enough of you who I have even spoken with-- why, then, should I deviate from my own course simply so that people I have little attachment to may live? As you have surmised, I will not do so merely out of the kindness of my heart.
Perhaps a very small number of you surviving might be acceptable.
You're right that it likely will take considerable effort to find another option. I wasn't necessarily asking that you be the one to expend that effort, so much as whether you will oppose it, but. . .
[She doesn't really expect him to care that much about them. But there are some people he cares about here, she thinks.]
If we move beyond hypotheticals for a moment, the circumstance as it stands is that some of the other Avatars don't agree with you. And while you are not likely to act out of kindness, some of them are certain to try to do so. [Like Wrath? Who apparently keeps giving us too much information and is getting punished for it?]
It would seem disadvantageous to me to continue to allow this fragmentation of efforts among the eight of you in what sort of outcome you're seeking, when the current view most of us hold is to look for an outcome that wouldn't be contrary to your goals. Why not instead make your conditions for cooperation known?
Would it, now. And precisely what makes you think you are in a position to allow anything of us?
[one brow arches, wings rustling faintly.]
It would not be the first time my opinion has run counter to a misguided majority. I have always known they may well falter, in the end, and prove incapable of following through.
You misunderstand me, I think. [She meant it seems disadvantageous to her for him to continue to allow it.] I do not believe I am in such a position. It is you who I believe are in a position to rectify it, if you choose to.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
No, I didn't think so. I wouldn't consider it worthwhile to approach you without a realistic plan that is at least as advantageous to you as letting us be eaten would be.
I only wanted to be certain I understood your motives correctly.
no subject
[he sounds amused, at that, one brow raised.]
More advantageous, I would say, if you have the capability of finding such.
no subject
What I'm suggesting is that if there were two alternatives, both with the same risks and rewards, but one had us dead and the other had us alive, perhaps you could be persuaded to the plan where we live. Obviously 'same risk and rewards' is hypothetical and dubious, but humour me for a moment.
no subject
Perhaps a very small number of you surviving might be acceptable.
no subject
You're right that it likely will take considerable effort to find another option. I wasn't necessarily asking that you be the one to expend that effort, so much as whether you will oppose it, but. . .
[She doesn't really expect him to care that much about them. But there are some people he cares about here, she thinks.]
If we move beyond hypotheticals for a moment, the circumstance as it stands is that some of the other Avatars don't agree with you. And while you are not likely to act out of kindness, some of them are certain to try to do so. [Like Wrath? Who apparently keeps giving us too much information and is getting punished for it?]
It would seem disadvantageous to me to continue to allow this fragmentation of efforts among the eight of you in what sort of outcome you're seeking, when the current view most of us hold is to look for an outcome that wouldn't be contrary to your goals. Why not instead make your conditions for cooperation known?
no subject
[one brow arches, wings rustling faintly.]
It would not be the first time my opinion has run counter to a misguided majority. I have always known they may well falter, in the end, and prove incapable of following through.
no subject